home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
- From: yrozijn@xs4all.nl (Yvon Rozijn)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.networking
- Subject: Re: Announce: AWeb 1.0 released!
- Date: 31 Mar 1996 17:54:50 GMT
- Organization: XS4ALL, networking for the masses
- Message-ID: <4jmgta$o88@news.xs4all.nl>
- References: <4iva78$5pa@news.xs4all.nl> <4j1f6e$984@news.uni-c.dk> <jasonb.827822336@cs.uwa.edu.au> <4j8o6r$9vj@serpens.rhein.de> <jasonb.827896888@cs.uwa.edu.au> <4jaue8$jh4@serpens.rhein.de> <jasonb.827996764@cs.uwa.edu.au> <4je3qj$kk@serpens.rhein.de> <jasonb.828076494@cs.uwa.edu.au> <4jgdfr$8f4@serpens.rhein.de> <jasonb.828104646@cs.uwa.edu.au> <4jh986$a5o@serpens.rhein.de> <jasonb.828179619@cs.uwa.edu.au>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: asd06-24.dial.xs4all.nl
- X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
-
- Jason S Birch (jasonb@cs.uwa.edu.au) wrote:
- :
- : Which would
- : you prefer: MUI apps running the bulk of their code at pri 20 because
- : the programmer didn't know any better, or MUI apps running the bulk of
- : their code at pri 0?
-
- I prefer visual feedback done at priority 20, and application processing
- done at priority 0. But with MUI it's either all at 20 or all at 0, unless
- the programmer is going into relatively much effort of doing things
- in different subtasks.
-
- : If the CPU intensive tasks [AWeb] spawns ran at a lower priority, it would
- : be [more responsive].
-
- Interesting idea. I'll keep it in mind.
-
- --
- ___ _
- Q : | #| : \|/ http://www. : [_]_
- -<_>- Yvon : | ==| yrozijn@ : >WWW< xs4all.nl/ : === ) Amiga
- / \ Rozijn : `---' xs4all.nl : /|\ ~yrozijn : O 4000
-